Key takeaways
- Attio is a general CRM you shape yourself with custom objects, workflows and apps. Delsivo has a set venture workflow.
- Attio's deal flow page does not describe inbound application forms, deck handling or thesis tracking. Those are Delsivo's core.
- Attio has a free plan and published per-seat prices. Delsivo has no published prices and is at the design partner stage.
- Delsivo is not a CRM: no inbox or calendar sync. CRM import and export are planned for a later release.
What each does
Delsivo
Delsivo gives a fund a branded portal where founders apply, reads each PDF deck with every fact cited to its slide, applies the fund's published thesis as a rubric, and keeps claims, follow-up requests, files and decisions in one deal record. Analysts and partners decide; AI suggests with citations. It is at the design partner stage.
Side by side
| Compared | Delsivo | Attio |
|---|---|---|
| Main job | Inbound intake, deck reading, thesis screening, claims and diligence requests per deal | A CRM for revenue teams, including sales and customer success, with investor use covered on a deal flow page source |
| Pipeline | Suggested stages from New to Closed, plus Passed and Revisit, and an analyst queue (Pilot) | Kanban-style pipeline views with custom workflows and fields source |
| Inbox and calendar | Not a CRM. No email or calendar capture and no relationship scoring. CRM import and export and email sync are planned for a later release | Connects to the inbox and calendar and logs activity from emails and calls source |
| Founder intake | A branded portal on your fund's subdomain with save and resume, a receipt and a secure founder link (Pilot). Your own domain in the first release | No inbound forms for deal intake are described on its deal flow page. Its apps directory lists form tools including Typeform, Fillout and Tally Forms source |
| Reading decks | PDF decks read with every extracted fact cited to its slide, and weak extraction flagged instead of guessed (Pilot) | No reading of PDFs, attachments or documents is described on its Ask Attio page source |
| Thesis | Your thesis as a versioned rubric. Each criterion shows Met, Mismatch or Unknown with the rule, value and source. Unknown becomes a question (Pilot) | Pitch deck management and investment thesis tracking are not described on its deal flow page source |
| AI | AI extracts, applies the rubric and drafts, always with a citation. People decide every stage change, pass and message to a founder | Ask Attio answers questions and can update deal stages and prep meetings; users approve, modify or reject suggested changes source |
| Integrations | A few: Slack (channel posts and DMs), and Google or Microsoft 365 calendars for meeting and email metadata. CRM import and export are planned for a later release | Its apps directory lists apps including Harmonic, Specter, Clay, Notion, Airtable and Google Sheets, and an MCP connection source |
Pricing
No published prices. Delsivo is at the design partner stage, and each pilot is priced with the fund. Annual workspace pricing, with application and AI usage allowances, is set after real pilot usage is measured. Funds pay; founders never do. See pricing.
- Attio: Free is $0 per user a month for up to 3 seats. Plus is $44 billed monthly or $35 billed annually, and Pro is $99 or $79, per user a month. Enterprise is custom. source
- Attio: AI and workflow features use monthly credits, with more workspace credits sold as add-ons. The pricing FAQ mentions a 14-day trial of the Pro plan. source
Building deal flow in Attio, or using a venture workflow
Attio suits teams that want to design their own system: objects for companies, founders and deals, automations that move records between stages, and apps for forms and enrichment. The work of designing and maintaining that setup sits with your team.
Delsivo makes the opposite trade. The structure is fixed around how a fund reviews a deal: application, deck, thesis fit, interview, claims, requests, decision. You configure your rubric, forms and branding, not the data model. If you want to shape everything yourself, Attio gives you more room.
Where Delsivo is weaker
- Delsivo is at the design partner stage. Attio is available today, with a free plan.
- Delsivo is not a CRM: no inbox or calendar sync, no relationship intelligence and no outreach sequences.
- Delsivo's structure is fixed around venture review. Attio lets you build custom objects, fields and workflows.
- Delsivo has no API or apps directory yet, and its only integrations are Slack and Google or Microsoft 365 calendars.
- Attio publishes per-seat prices. Delsivo's prices are set after pilots.
Which to choose
Choose Attio
You want a flexible CRM you shape yourself, with a free plan, published prices, inbox and calendar sync and an apps directory, available today.
Choose Delsivo
You want intake and screening built for venture, with a branded founder portal, decks read with slide citations and checks against a written thesis, and you can join a design partner pilot.
Choose Both, Attio and Delsivo
Attio stays the CRM and Delsivo handles inbound intake and screening. Records move by hand until CRM import and export, planned for a later release.
Sources
- attio.com/ (checked 6 November 2026)
- attio.com/solutions/deal-flow-management-software (checked 6 November 2026)
- attio.com/platform/ask (checked 6 November 2026)
- attio.com/apps (checked 6 November 2026)
- attio.com/pricing (checked 6 November 2026)
This comparison is based on information Attio publishes, read on the dates shown. It is not a scored hands-on benchmark. Attio is a trademark of its owner. Delsivo makes a competing product. Corrections are welcome through our contact page.