Skip to content
Delsivo
Template

Investment thesis template for venture funds

Nine short sections that turn a fund's strategy into rules, weighted preferences and beliefs you could be proved wrong about.

How it works

Short answer: This investment thesis template turns a fund's strategy into nine short sections: a one-sentence summary, hard rules, weighted preferences, beliefs written so evidence could disprove them, exclusions, exceptions, the questions you always ask, what a missing answer means, and a change log. Copy it, fill it with your partners in one sitting, and give it a version number so screening decisions can be traced to the thesis in force.

Key takeaways

  • Separate hard rules from preferences; only hard rules should cause a pass.
  • Write beliefs you could be wrong about, with what would change your mind.
  • Say what a missing fact means: a question, not a rejection.
  • Version and date the thesis every time it changes.

Investment thesis template to copy

Section 8 is short but matters: it stops a screen from rejecting good companies because a deck left something out.

Investment thesis (plain text)
INVESTMENT THESIS
Fund: [name]            Version: [number]            Date: [date]            Approved by: [partners]

1. IN ONE SENTENCE
We back [stage] companies building [what] for [which customers] in [where], because we believe [the change you are betting on].

2. HARD RULES (a deal outside these is a pass unless an exception below applies)
Stage: [e.g. pre-seed and seed only]
Geography: [where the company or its founders are based]
Cheque size: [first cheque range] with [reserve policy for follow-ons]
Ownership target: [range, if you have one]
Instrument: [SAFE / priced / either]
Legal limits from our fund documents: [sectors or structures we cannot invest in]

3. PREFERENCES (how much each counts: high / medium / low)
[Customer type, e.g. sells to businesses]                      Weight: [ ]
[Business model, e.g. recurring revenue]                        Weight: [ ]
[Evidence, e.g. at least one paying customer]                   Weight: [ ]
[Team, e.g. a founder who has worked in the industry]           Weight: [ ]
[Other]                                                         Weight: [ ]

4. WHAT WE BELIEVE (each written so evidence could prove it wrong)
Belief 1: [ ]    What would change our mind: [ ]
Belief 2: [ ]    What would change our mind: [ ]
Belief 3: [ ]    What would change our mind: [ ]

5. EXCLUSIONS
We do not invest in: [sectors, models or practices you rule out]

6. EXCEPTIONS
We will consider a deal outside a hard rule when: [the specific condition, and who must agree]

7. QUESTIONS WE ALWAYS ASK
Before a first meeting: [ ]
Before diligence: [ ]

8. WHAT A MISSING ANSWER MEANS
If the deck doesn't tell us a fact a rule needs, we mark it Unknown and ask the founder. Unknown is not a reason to pass.

9. CHANGE LOG
[date]: [what changed and why]

When to write or rewrite it

  • Before raising a new fund, so the thesis matches what you tell limited partners.
  • Before opening an inbound form, so the form asks for what the thesis needs.
  • When partners notice they keep making exceptions: the thesis may have drifted.
  • When a new team member starts screening and needs to apply it the way partners do.

How to fill it in well

A fictional fund, Harbourline Pre-Seed, first wrote "we back great founders in fintech". After using the template, its one-sentence version read: "We back pre-seed companies building payment and reconciliation software for small European manufacturers, because we believe their banks will not build it." Every word in the second version can be checked against a deck; none in the first can.

Keep preferences few. Five weighted preferences are easier to apply consistently than fifteen.

What to leave out

  • Criteria about founders' age, gender, schools or former employers. They are proxies, not evidence.
  • Vague words such as "exceptional" or "world-class" that two partners would read differently.
  • Rules you won't actually enforce. If you always bend one, make it a preference.

Using the thesis with or without Delsivo

The template stands alone, and the free thesis builder turns the same structure into Markdown or JSON. Delsivo's thesis screening, planned for the Pilot release, is designed to store a thesis as versioned hard rules, weighted preferences, exceptions and questions, and to return Met, Mismatch or Unknown per criterion with its source. People make the decisions.

FAQ

Questions about investment thesis template

A one-sentence summary, hard rules, weighted preferences, testable beliefs, exclusions, exceptions, standard questions and a change log.

A short public version helps founders decide whether to apply. Keep weightings and detailed exceptions internal.

Specific enough that two partners screening the same deck would reach the same fit result for each criterion.
Design partner pilots

Review your next deals with the evidence in one place

We set up your branded portal and thesis rubric with you, calibrate on your historical deals, then run live intake beside your current process.

Talk to us